SFDR 2.0: A reset of the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Framework

On 20 November 2025, the European Commission published its SFDR 2.0 Proposal to amend the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). The initiative aims to simplify disclosure requirements, improve coherence with other EU legislation, and enhance transparency for investors. Implementation is foreseen between 2027 and 2028, with further delegated act.

The SFDR, in force since March 2021, introduced disclosure obligations for financial market participants on the integration of sustainability risks and the consideration of adverse impacts at entity and product level. It also required additional disclosures for products promoting environmental or social characteristics (Article 8) or pursuing a sustainable investment objective (Article 9).

However, the EU Commission’s review of the SFDR has shown that the framework would benefit from greater clarity, usability and alignment with the overall EU sustainable finance architecture.

 

Key issues identified by SFDR implementation

A comprehensive assessment by the EU Commission identified several shortcomings:

graphic 1.png

 

Current SME burden under SFDR is estimated at €163M annually:

  • €43M 

    from entity-level disclosures
  • €120M 

    from product-level disclosures¹

¹ SFDR 2.0 Proposal – published 20 November 2025

 

SFDR evolution timeline: Key milestones shaping the new disclosure framework

Visual overview of the major policy steps that led to the SFDR 2.0 Proposal and its upcoming implementation

 

Graphic 2.png

 

Key changes introduced by the SFDR 2.0 proposal

Below is an overview of the main regulatory changes proposed by the European Commission to simplify the framework and enhance clarity for investors:

 

Removal of Entity-Level Principal Adverse Impact (PAI) Disclosures

  • Entity-level requirements on PAI and remuneration policies are deleted. Large entities subject to the CSRD will continue reporting impacts under corporate sustainability rules.
  • Expected impact: approximately 25% reduction in overall SFDR disclosure costs and estimated annual savings of €56M.
  • However, product-level disclosures are simplified to essential, comparable and meaningful data; the new formats are designed to be retail-friendly.

Removal from the scope of application

  • Financial advisers and Portfolio managers have been removed from the SFDR scope.

Discontinuation of Articles 8 and 9 as Disclosure Categories

  • The current product categorization under Articles 8 and 9 is removed. Products wishing to make sustainability-related claims must comply with one of three new categories.

Introduction of a clear ESG product categorization via a Three-label System

Sustainable Category (Article 9)Products investing in undertakings, activities or assets that are sustainable or contribute to environmental and/or social objectives.
Transition Category (Article 7)Products investing in undertakings, activities or assets on a credible path to sustainability while contributing to environmental or social transition objectives.
ESG Basics Category (Article 8)Products integrating sustainability factors beyond risk management consideration in their investment strategy.

Each category applies minimum criteria, including:

  • A 70% investment threshold aligned with the stated sustainability objective or strategy (the remaining investments should not contradict the sustainability related claims of the financial product),
  • Common exclusions for harmful activities: Human rights violations, tobacco, prohibited weapons, fossil fuels above set thresholds, activities causing severe environmental harm

Stricter Naming and Marketing Rules

  • Only products categorized under the new framework may use sustainability-related terms in names and marketing communications. Non-categorized products may include ancillary sustainability information in disclosures, provided it is not a central element and does not constitute sustainability-related claims.

Exemption of disclosures for closed-ended financial products

  • Closed-ended financial products created before the date of application of SFDR 2.0 are exempt to provide disclosures.

Simplified Disclosure Templates

  • Reduction of disclosure requirements for Articles 7, 8 and 9 limited to two pages and one page for additional impact-related disclosures under Articles 7 and 9.

Removal of the Sustainable Investment Concept

  • The concept of sustainable investment has been removed and as a result, the Do Not Significant Harm (DNSH) principle no longer applies.
  • Furthermore, only Articles 7 and 9 pursuing an environmental objective can use impact in fund’s name.

The SFDR 2.0 Proposal represents a structural redesign of the EU sustainability disclosure framework, aiming to deliver clearer, more reliable and more comparable information to investors. By strengthening safeguards against greenwashing, in line with the direction set by ESMA’s Guidelines on fund names,  the new regime seeks to enhance trust and transparency across financial products.

Beyond simplifying the framework, the reform is expected to lead to clearer and shorter disclosures for investors, reduce overlap with other EU sustainability reporting rules, lower compliance costs for financial providers, and further strengthen protection against greenwashing.

The Proposal will now be examined by the European Parliament and the Council, after which a limited set of implementing acts will specify the technical details and disclosure templates required for application.


How Forvis Mazars can help


Navigating the transition from the existing SFDR framework to the revised SFDR 2.0 regime presents important strategic and operational considerations. Forvis Mazars is well positioned to support financial market participants in managing this transition effectively:

assess.jpg

SFDR 2.0 Assessment & Product Categorisation

  • Independent review of existing product classifications and disclosures
  • Mapping of financial products to the new SFDR 2.0 categories
  • Gap analysis against new thresholds, exclusions and naming requirements, including benchmarking
  • Prioritization of transition actions based on regulatory impact and product strategy
Cible.png

Transition Strategy & Product Re-Design

  • Development of a tailored SFDR 2.0 transition roadmap
  • Re-design of investment, sustainability and control frameworks to meet the new category requirements
  • Comprehensive updating of product documentation, including KIDs, prospectuses, marketing materials, website disclosure sections and portfolio management guidelines
  • Establishment of implementation timelines aligned with regulatory expectations
support.jpg

Implementation Support

  • Enhancements to governance structures, policies, procedures and ESG methodologies
  • Review and preparation of pre-contractual, periodic and website disclosures
  • Targeted training for product, ESG, compliance and distribution teams
malette.png

Post-Implementation Assurance

  • Independent validation of SFDR 2.0 classifications and disclosures
  • Testing of ongoing compliance with thresholds, exclusions and sustainability indicators
  • Review of naming, marketing and sustainability claims
  • Compliance support as delegated acts and regulatory guidance evolve

 

Regulatory references

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (SFDR), Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 (PRIIPs), and repealing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288

Click here

Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector

Click here

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 of 6 April 2022

Click here

ESMA Guidelines on funds’ names using ESG or sustainability-related terms (ESMA34-1592494965-657)

Click here

Want to know more?