Navigating Corporate Interest Expense Deductibility in Mauritius

As companies regularly require additional financing as part of their operations, claiming interest expenses is an important item on the list of tax-deductible expenses. This article provides a clear overview of what businesses need to know to effectively manage their taxes while remaining compliant with local laws.

Overview of Interest Expense Deductibility

Section 19 of the Income Tax Act outlines the framework for deducting interest expenses. Specifically, Section 19(1) provides that a corporation can deduct interest incurred on capital used exclusively for generating gross income within the income year.

In simpler terms, this means that if a company secures financing and utilizes those funds solely for income-producing activities, the associated interest expenses can be effectively deducted from its taxable income. However, interpreting sections of law has never been straightforward; one must consider some important aspects of this section, specifically the definition of gross income related to income-producing activities.

Defining Gross Income: For the purposes of Section 19(1), gross income encompasses a broad range of revenue, including business profits, rental income, royalties, dividends, and interest under Section 10(1)(b), (c), or (d) of the ITA 1995. Therefore, if your corporation is engaged in activities that generate any of these types of income, it generally qualifies for interest expense deductions.

It is important to note that the Mauritius Revenue Authority (MRA) may, in certain instances, request certification from a qualified auditor to validate that the interest claimed has been incurred purely for income-generating purposes. However, such requests are infrequent.

Anti-Abuse Rules

Anti-abuse rules for interest expense are vital to prevent tax avoidance by companies that might otherwise misuse deductions through excessive borrowing. Such manipulation creates an unfair advantage, distorting competition and undermining businesses that follow the rules. Additionally, protecting tax revenue is crucial as it funds essential public services; rampant avoidance can erode this base. These rules encourage genuine economic activity rather than artificial transactions, simplify compliance by limiting manipulation opportunities, and enhance transparency in corporate reporting.

The ITA 1995 also provides anti-abuse rules for interest deductibility under Article 19(3).

(i) Interest Payable to Non-Residents:

• The MRA may refuse a deduction where the interest is payable to a non-resident who is not chargeable to tax on the amount of the interest.
• This condition can be broken down into two specific parts: (i) interest payable to a non-resident and (ii) not chargeable to tax on the interest amount.
• While the first part is clear, there is ambiguity surrounding the second part. Emphasis is placed on the term “chargeable to tax,” but the regulations do not specify whether this refers to primary taxation or secondary taxation.
• However, since this condition has not been invoked by the MRA, a general confirmation of whether the interest payable is subject to tax in the non-resident’s country is essential.
• This provision ensures that interest payments to foreign entities are adequately accounted for and reflects the country’s commitment to resolving tax avoidance issues within its jurisdiction.
• A recent Supreme Court case involving Oberoi Mauritius Ltd has brought renewed attention to the interpretation of tax deductibility rules in Mauritius. As a non-resident company, Oberoi secured a loan from another non-resident entity and subsequently lent that amount to a Mauritian entity. The interest income received from the Mauritian entity was declared as chargeable income, and Oberoi paid tax on the gross interest amount after deducting the interest paid to its non-resident lender.
• However, the Mauritius Revenue Authority (MRA) disallowed the interest payment deduction, arguing that payments made to a non-resident entity—one not chargeable to tax in Mauritius were not eligible for deduction.
• In the landmark case of Oberoi Mauritius Ltd v. The Mauritius Revenue Authority, the Supreme Court of Mauritius addressed significant issues regarding the deductibility of interest expenses within the context of corporate taxation. The appellant, Oberoi Mauritius Ltd, sought to deduct interest payments made on loans taken for financing its business operations.
• The key contention revolved around whether these interest expenses, incurred on funds utilized for generating income, qualified as deductible under the ITA 1995.
• The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Oberoi, affirming that interest paid on borrowings used for generating gross income is indeed deductible, provided there is a demonstrable link between the expenses and the income-generating activities. The Court emphasized the importance of establishing the purpose of the loan and the necessity of maintaining robust documentation to support the deductibility claims. This case set a significant precedent in Mauritian tax law, reaffirming that businesses must substantiate their interest expense claims with clear evidence that the borrowed funds were solely utilized for income-producing activities, reinforcing compliance with tax regulations while promoting fair tax practices.
• This ruling underscore the importance of precise statutory interpretation and reinforces the need for taxpayers to carefully assess the tax implications of financial arrangements involving non-resident entities.

(ii) Deferred Interest Payments:

• According to Section 19(3)(b), if interest payments are not likely to be made in cash within a reasonable timeframe, the MRA may deny the deduction.
• This measure aims to prevent corporations from claiming tax deductions on interest unlikely to be paid.
• However, it is essential to recognize that there are no explicit guidelines established by the MRA to define what constitutes a “reasonable timeframe,” leaving some ambiguity for corporations to navigate.

Importance of Documentation and Compliance

To substantiate claims for interest expense deductions, corporations must maintain meticulous documentation. Essential records include:

• Loan agreements
• Statements detailing interest payments
• Correspondence related to lending arrangements

Thorough documentation is critical in the event of an MRA audit and will serve as evidence to support the legitimacy of interest deductions claimed.

Conclusion

The Mauritian tax framework allows corporations to deduct interest expenses, provided they adhere to the stipulations set forth in the ITA 1995. A comprehensive understanding of these regulations enables businesses to effectively manage their tax liabilities while remaining compliant with the law.

Furthermore, the tax provisions under Section 19(1) and Section 19(3) cannot be applied in isolation; the deductibility test for interest expenses and other anti-avoidance provisions on interest expenses should be considered to determine the appropriate tax treatment. Moreover, it should be noted that there have been changes in the tax legislation in Mauritius.

^Disclaimer:

^{The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal or financial advice. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the content, the laws and regulations discussed may change over time. Readers are strongly encouraged to consult with a qualified tax professional or legal advisor before making any decisions or taking any action based on the information contained herein. The author and publisher disclaim any liability for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information.}

 ^{© 2025 Forvis Mazars in Mauritius. All rights reserved.}