Following the changes, the main focus of MDR analyses will shift to cross-border arrangements, including structures and transactions implemented within international groups. The amendments will be particularly relevant to financial market entities, holding companies, corporate groups and entities carrying out significant legal-form changes, restructurings, or similar transactions, as these entities have traditionally been, and will continue to be, among those most exposed to MDR reporting obligations.
MDR amendment – key issues for taxpayers
- End of domestic arrangement reporting – once the amendment enters into force, only cross-border arrangements will be reportable. This does not, however, automatically terminate all MDR obligations relating to events occurring before the effective date of the amendments. The transitional provisions and any ongoing reporting processes will need to be reviewed, particularly with regard to the reporting of cross-border arrangements, standardised arrangements, and information obligations towards other participants in an arrangement.
- Alignment of the MDR scope with the EU model, primarily in relation to direct taxes – the scope of the regulations will be limited mainly to income taxes, but not exclusively. It will also continue to apply to other taxes that are not expressly excluded by the legislation, such as the tax on civil law transactions. Indirect taxes will cease to be covered, which to date has been one of the specific features of the Polish MDR regime.
- Change to the definition of the main benefit test – following the amendments, the key question will be whether obtaining a tax advantage is one of the main benefits that may reasonably be expected from a given arrangement. At the same time, the existing reference to whether the taxpayer could have chosen an alternative, reasonable course of action that would not result in the tax advantage is expected to be removed. In certain situations, this may result in the MDR reporting obligation applying more broadly than before and covering arrangements that were not previously reportable.
- Changes to the list of hallmarks – the amendment is intended to align the scope of the Polish MDR regime more closely with the standard established under the DAC6 Directive. In practice, this will include the removal of the so-called “other specific hallmarks,” which constituted an additional Polish extension of the EU rules. As a result, certain situations that have so far been reportable solely on the basis of these domestic hallmarks should no longer fall within the scope of MDR.
- Changes to the roles of entities participating in an arrangement – the category of “supporting person” will be abolished. However, certain entities providing support may, in specific circumstances, fall within the definition of an intermediary. This will require responsibilities to be reassigned between advisers, taxpayers, group companies, operational teams, and other participants. It may also require the update of procedures other than the MDR procedure, including procedures relating to fiscal penal liability, tax strategy, and internal tax governance frameworks.
- No individual (binding) tax rulings concerning MDR – the proposed amendments will also prevent taxpayers from obtaining individual tax rulings confirming the correctness of the classification of a particular arrangement for MDR purposes.
- Changes to reporting obligations and forms – certain information obligations will be simplified. In particular, the MDR-3 information form concerning the use of a reportable tax arrangement will be allowed to be submitted by an authorised representative, while the MDR-2 information form will be abolished.
- Professional secrecy and sector-specific confidentiality obligations – the amendment changes the reporting rules applicable to entities subject to legally protected professional secrecy obligations. As a rule, lawyers and tax advisers will no longer report arrangements themselves, but will instead notify the relevant taxpayers of the reporting obligations imposed on them. This will increase the compliance burden placed directly on taxpayers.
How will the amendment affect existing MDR procedures?
Following the changes, the regulations will no longer expressly require entities to maintain an internal MDR procedure, and the sanction for failure to adopt such a procedure will be repealed. This does not, however, mean that MDR procedures will become unnecessary. The MDR regulations will remain sufficiently specialised, technical, and difficult to apply that, for many entities, maintaining an appropriate procedure, or at least an internal verification process, will continue to be advisable from a corporate governance perspective,