What is covered under climate risk?
Climate risk encompasses the potential financial and operational impacts arising from climate change, including both physical risks (e.g., extreme weather events) and transition risks (e.g., policy changes, market shifts).
- Physical risk involves the direct impact of climate change on assets, infrastructure and operations, such as damage from extreme weather events, rising sea levels and long-term shifts in climate patterns. Physical risks are divided into two categories:
- Acute risks relate to extreme, abnormal climate and weather events such as floods, heat stress, wildfires and hurricanes.
- Chronic risks relate to long-term changes to the environment and weather patterns. They arise from progressive shifts, such as increasing temperatures, sea-level rises, water stress, biodiversity loss, land use change, resource scarcity or habitat destruction.
- Transition risks arise from the implementation of new policies and regulations aimed at achieving net-zero emissions and a more sustainable economy, which entails significant structural changes to the economy. These transition risks could be triggered by:
- Changes in regulations and policies such as increased pricing of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions due to carbon taxation, direct regulation, enhanced emissions reporting, etc.
- Changes in technology such as renewable energy, carbon capture and storage, lower emissions technology, etc.
- Changes in consumer preferencesand investment strategies, including changes in demand for carbon-intensive transport, energy-efficient housing and appliances, reputational risks, etc.
- Change in reputation caused by increased stakeholder concern regarding the impact of companies on the environment or the stigmatisation of certain sectors.
How are financial services companies impacted by climate risk?
Financial services companies are affected by climate risk through potential credit losses, market volatility, operational disruptions and increased regulatory scrutiny. These risks can impact their financial stability and long-term viability. The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) defines climate-related financial risks as “the potential risks that may arise from climate change or from efforts to mitigate climate change, their related impacts and their economic and financial consequences”.
What regulations apply to climate risk in the UK, EU and North America?
- In the UK, the main supervisory statement for banks and insurers is the SS319 - Enhancing banks’ and insurers’ approaches to managing the financial risks from climate change published by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) in April 2019, which will be updated by year-end 2025 following the recent publication of CP1025.
- In Europe, both the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) have established frameworks to manage climate-related risks for financial institutions. The ECB published its Guide on climate-related and environmental risks in November 2020 and the EBA published its Guidelines on the management of ESG risks, in January 2025 to set clear expectations on how these risks can be incorporated into the prudential framework.
- In October 2023, the US Federal Reserve published the SR 23-9: Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions. In parallel, some states also established their own frameworks. This the case of New York with the Guidance for New York State Regulated Banking and Mortgage Organizations Relating to Management of Material Financial and Operational Risks from Climate Change published in December 2023. California also published the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (S.B. 253) and the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (S.B. 261) in October 2023.
- In Canada, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) has issued a Climate Risk Management guideline outlining expectations for governance, risk management and climate-related financial disclosures. It includes requirements for climate scenario analysis, stress testing and capital and liquidity adequacy.
What are the key elements of climate risk assessment?
Climate risk assessment involves analysing exposure to physical and transition risks, evaluating potential financial impacts and integrating climate risk into overall risk management strategies. The main steps are as follows:
- Risk Identification: Understand and identify the types of climate risks faced by the organization and assess its vulnerability to them.
- Risk Assessment: Institutions utilise scenario analysis to evaluate the potential financial impacts of various climate scenarios. This process helps firms understand how different climate-related risks could affect asset values, liabilities and overall financial stability. It is essential to define models that translate climate risks into financial risks by considering their potentiality, vulnerability and impacts.
- Integration into Financial Risk Management: Climate risks are incorporated into existing risk management processes, including capital allocation, loan approvals and portfolio monitoring. Consequently, climate risk can be seen as a risk in itself or as a driver for more traditional financial risks (credit, market, etc.).
What are the main climate scenarios?
Main climate scenarios include various projections of future climate conditions based on different levels of GHG emissions, such as the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). Climate scenarios are usually long-term scenarios based on extensive analysis and modelling of key factors such as demography, energy demand projections, emission pathways, carbon budgets and policy and technology assumptions. Regulators and independent companies are also developing their own scenarios:
- ECB CST 2022 (Macro-financial scenarios for the 2022 climate risk stress test)
- BoE CBES 2021 (Results of the 2021 Climate Biennial Exploratory Scenario)
- FED CSA 2023 (The Fed - Overview of the Pilot CSA Exercise)
- OSFI SCSE 2024 (Standardized Climate Scenario Exercise - Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions)
- Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) scenarios (NGFS Scenarios Portal)
What is the objective of climate stress testing?
The objective of climate stress testing is to assess the resilience of financial institutions when faced with climate-related risks by simulating various adverse climate scenarios and evaluating their potential impacts in the short medium and long term.
What are the climate-related reporting standards?
Climate-related reporting standards are frameworks and guidelines that help organizations disclose information about their climate-related risks, opportunities and impacts. The main reporting standards are the following:
- Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD): Established by the G20’s Financial Stability Board, the TCFD provides recommendations for companies to disclose information on governance, strategy, risk management and metrics and targets related to climate change.
- IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards: Developed by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), these include:
- IFRS S1: General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information.
- IFRS S2: Climate-related Disclosures.
- The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Provides a comprehensive set of standards for sustainability reporting, including climate-related disclosures.
- The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS): A set of standards developed by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) to guide companies in disclosing their sustainability-related information.
What is the BoE’s approach to scenario analysis?
In April 2024, the BoE published an article with useful insights for financial institutions on using scenario analysis to measure climate-related financial risks. The article focuses on climate as a financial risk from a system-wide risk perspective and with regards to the BoE’s own financial operations. While not a supervisory guidance, the article explores how central banks and financial institutions can use scenario analysis to quantify these risks. It is therefore advisable for regulated firms to understand the key messages of this article and assess where they can incorporate these in their own thinking around quantifying climate risks as a part of their stress testing and ongoing operations. Find out more.
What changes does the Consultation Paper 10/25 bring in the UK?
Topic | SS3/19 as of November 2024 | CP10/25 |
|---|---|---|
| Governance | Focuses on foundational governance with an emphasis on awareness and oversight, without formal links to specific accountability functions. | Expands on these expectations by emphasising board accountability, integrating climate risk into business strategy, and linking governance to the Senior Managers & Certification Regime (SM&CR). It also highlights the importance of defining a climate risk appetite and promoting an internal challenge culture. |
| Risk Management | Encourages integration of climate risks into the firm’s existing risk management framework. Provides limited guidance on how climate risks might manifest across traditional risk categories. | Provides a detailed mapping of how climate risks can transmit through credit, market, liquidity, insurance, and operational risks. Firms need to create internal classifications and identify exposures to both transition and physical risks. Firms must show how climate risk factors are identified, monitored, and mitigated— rather than just acknowledged. Requires documentation of control effectiveness and procedures for escalating issues related to climate risk. |
| Climate Scenario Analysis (CSA) | Recommends firms use scenario analysis for both short-term and long-term assessment of financial risks but offers little on methodology or application. No expectations regarding governance or documentation of results. | Encourages firms to embed CSA in their business planning and decision-making processes. Emphasises alignment with existing stress testing and scenario analysis approaches issued by regulatory authorities, such as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS). Suggests use of specific methodological approaches to CSA and outlines expectations for scenario design, including varying levels of severity and time horizons. Recommends firms clearly document the assumptions, parameters, results, and board engagement with scenario outputs. Proposes firms regularly review and update the scenarios in use, including use of sensitivity analyses on current model selections and calibrations to ensures the scenarios remain in line with market best practice. |
| Disclosures | Supports Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)-aligned disclosures. | Builds on SS3/19 by recommending alignment with the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), which incorporates the previous TCFD recommendations. |
| Data | Notes the importance of data but doesn’t treat it as a standalone theme. Recommends use of data from publicly available sources or external experts. | Emphasises the importance of robust, standardised climate-related data with sufficient coverage and relevance. Highlights the risks of data gaps and recommends firms implement strategic plans to close data gaps wherever possible while implementing contingency solutions in the interim periods. Encourages firms to assess the credibility of third-party data providers and establish adequate governance overuse of third-party data. Recommends firms to develop internal capabilities for climate data sourcing, processing, and validation. |
| Banking-specific Issues | Applies a uniform set of expectations to banks and insurers without sector-specific tailoring. | Considerations for accounting for climate-related risks in financial reporting requirements. Integration of climate-related credit and market risks into risk management frameworks, in line with BCBS regulations. Embedding climate risk in ICAAP processes and capital planning. Incorporation of climate-related risks into funding and liquidity adequacy assessments under ILAAP. Potential impact of climate risks on business reputation and strategy. |
| Insurance-specific Issues | Offers no detailed expectations tailored to insurers. Mentions ORSA and SCR in passing but provides no direct guidance. | Embed climate risk in ORSA. Adjust underwriting policies based on long-term climate projections. Factor climate change into investment strategies and valuation models. Consider climate stress scenarios in the SCR. Encourages alignment with international initiatives under Solvency II enhancements. |
If you want to find out more about what was announced in CP10/25, read our dedicated article “New expectations for financial services firms on climate risk: everything you need to know on CP10/25".
External scrutiny, corporate values and financial impact are driving banks to address new challenges across business functions
CEO and Board: strategy and governance
- Ensure the board can provide oversight of climate-related risk and opportunity.
- Define and implement a business strategy that considers the actual/potential impact of climate risk and business opportunity.
CRO: risk identification, regulatory stress test and capital
- Risk identification relating to climate risk.
- Quantify the impact of climate risk on asset portfolios & economic/regulatory capital.
- Perform stress tests.
- Monitor climate-related risk to business solvency and capital.
- Implement risk mitigation for climate risk.
CFO: regulatory and financial reporting
- Ensure regulatory and financial reporting includes the impact on climate risk.
- Produce and monitor a business plan aligned with the business strategy that reflects the impact of climate risk.
CIO: asset allocation and security selection
- Design a sustainable and green investment strategy that meets business objectives.
- Set top-down and bottom-up climate metrics.
- Ensure they can report climate risk on investment portfolios by incorporating climate data into asset allocation and investment selection.
We provide a holistic climate risk management service offering
Governance
- Capability building around climate risk at the Board and Senior Management level.
- Development and review of Climate-Related & Environmental (CR&E) risk management framework.
- Development of appropriate key risk indicators and limits for CR&E risks.
- Ensure regulatory compliance against climate risk management expectations through gap analysis and roadmap preparation.
Strategy
- Transition plan design.
- Climate risk appetite set up.
- CR&E factor integration into business decision making.
- Strategy and business planning.
Risk management
- Gap analysis and roadmap design.
- Data management framework.
- Model development and implementation.
- Model validation.
- Scenario design.
- CliMate tool license.
- External and internal audit support.
- Advisory/framework review (RAS, ICAAP / ILAAP, climate risk policy, etc.).
Metrics and targets
- Statistical modelling for transition and physical risk integration into credit, market and liquidity risks.
Case study: CliMate
Introducing our in-house Climate Risk Assessment Tool, CliMate, a solution designed to empower financial services companies in navigating the complex landscape of climate risk. From portfolio visualisation to stress testing and incorporation into financial risks, CliMate supports financial services companies to conduct high-quality climate risk identification and quantification across core asset classes using Forvis Mazars’s proprietary models:
- Study dashboard: Clients can create, save, review, update and have access to all climate scenario analyses they need for transition risk and physical risk.
- Corporate dashboard: This module supports risk identification and assessment by providing key transition risk indicators with a global coverage. It quantifies the carbon footprint of clients’ portfolios, offering insights into their contribution to climate change. It also offers advanced comparison functionalities across sectors, portfolios, and selected companies.
- Mortgage dashboard: This module supports risk identification and assessment by providing key physical risk indicators with global coverage. It quantifies the damage and financial impact of hazards (flooding, drought, windstorm, tropical cyclone) on different types of collaterals with a risk-based visualisation.
- Recap dashboard: This functionality enables FS companies to view the stress test outputs on credit risk, including probability of default, loss given default and expected credit loss calculations using a bottom-up approach. All datapoints can be extracted for high transparency and incorporated into clients’ modelling, reporting, disclosure and other business stream frameworks.
Get in touch with our climate risk experts
If you have any questions on climate risk or would like to request a demo of our tool, please get in touch with our climate risk experts.
This website uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are necessary, while others help us analyse our traffic, serve advertising and deliver customised experiences for you.
For more information on the cookies we use, please refer to our Privacy Policy.
This website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Analytical cookies help us enhance our website by collecting information on its usage.
We use marketing cookies to increase the relevancy of our advertising campaigns.




