EBA Strategic Priorities for 2026
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has outlined its work programme for 2026, reaffirming its core mandates in policy development, supervisory convergence, and risk analysis.
These guidelines aim to ensure that fund names are not misleading and accurately reflect the underlying investment strategies and objectives.
Scope and applicability
The guidelines apply to UCITS management companies, Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFMs) and other relevant entities. They are designed to ensure that all marketing communications and fund documentation are fair, clear and not misleading.
The guidelines came into effect three months after their publication on ESMA’s website in May 2024. New funds are required to comply from 21 November 2024, while existing funds must comply by the end of the transition period on 21 May 2025.
Purpose of the guidelines
The primary goal is to prevent the misuse of ESG or sustainability-related terminology in fund names, which could result in names that are unfair, unclear, or misleading to investors. A fund’s name is a key source of information for investors and can significantly influence decision-making.
Q&As published by ESMA in late 2024 clarified several aspects of sustainable finance under the SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) framework:
Compliance and reporting obligations
Competent authorities and financial market participants are expected to make every effort to comply with the guidelines. Authorities were required to report their compliance status to ESMA within two months of the publication. Financial market participants are not required to report compliance directly; however, they must adhere to the guidelines in practice.
Key terms
The guidelines define key terms, including transition, environmental, social, governance, impact, and sustainability. Understanding these definitions is crucial for fund managers seeking to comply with the naming requirements.
Recommendations for fund managers
Combined terms
Where a fund name includes multiple sustainability-related terms, the requirements for each term apply cumulatively—except where the term “transition” is included, in which case some flexibility may apply.
Supervisory expectations
National competent authorities are expected to monitor compliance throughout the fund’s life cycle. They should investigate inconsistencies and ensure that fund names accurately represent investment strategies and objectives.
Conclusion
These ESG fund naming guidelines represent a significant step by ESMA towards promoting clarity, transparency, and investor trust in sustainable finance. By aligning with these rules, fund managers can reduce the risk of greenwashing and support informed investor decision-making.
This initiative underlines ESMA’s commitment to developing a fair and transparent financial market, particularly as ESG investing and sustainability considerations continue to grow in importance.
At Forvis Mazars, our prudential risk experts recognise that evolving regulations remain a key driver of strategic priorities for financial institutions. We support our clients in the financial services sector to navigate the complex regulatory environment, including ESG-related compliance.
We work closely with you to assess your regulatory obligations and implement practical strategies for full compliance with sustainable finance regulations, including ESMA’s fund naming guidelines and the SFDR framework.
This website uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are necessary, while others help us analyse our traffic, serve advertising and deliver customised experiences for you.
For more information on the cookies we use, please refer to our Privacy Policy.
This website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Analytical cookies help us enhance our website by collecting information on its usage.
We use marketing cookies to increase the relevancy of our advertising campaigns.