Fraud detection: How to assess data for hidden risks?

Uncover financial fraud detection with two-tiered strategy: public red flags & forensic data analytics. Forvis Mazars guides accounting, compliance, and risk management.

Fraud continues to pose a significant threat to financial stability, often eroding public trust and triggering regulatory scrutiny. A two-tiered fraud detection approach, forensic red flag analysis and deep-dive investigations, may help counter these risks by combining high-level public data with internal forensic accounting.​ 

How can you identify early red flags?

The preliminary stage of fraud detection typically emphasizes finding anomalies within publicly disclosed information. This high-level review is particularly pertinent for internal auditors, finance teams, and compliance officers conducting initial risk assessments.​ 

Key fraud red flags signaling potential financial misstatement: 

  • Revenue growth rates significantly exceeding industry benchmarks without credible business drivers.​ 
  • An operating cash flow to operating income ratio persistently below 0.8.​ 
  • Sudden, unexplained gross margin fluctuations.​ 
  • Frequent financial restatements or revisions to previously issued results.​ 
  • An Altman Z-Score below 1.8, which may reflect underlying financial distress risks.​

When is in-depth forensic analysis necessary? 

Red flags trigger with targeted forensic investigations, using confidential datasets, accounting entries, contractual documents, and email correspondence to uncover operational discrepancies.​ 

Multidisciplinary teams comprising forensic accountants and IT auditors often employ specific analytical techniques: 

  • Benford's Law Analysis to evaluate numerical data distributions for irregularities.​ 
  • Vendor and customer concentration assessments to identify potential collusion schemes.​ 
  • Ghost employee audits via payroll and HR database comparisons. 
  • Document authenticity verification utilizing metadata and forensic imaging.​

What lessons can professionals learn from past cases? 

Cases like Luckin Coffee and Wirecard over the past decade highlight how unchecked revenue anomalies and unverified third-party balances can lead to severe financial consequences.​ 

Internal audit pros must integrate data analytics, AI, and cross-functional teams against evolving fraud schemes. As perpetrators adapt their methods, detection frameworks must evolve in parallel to maintain resilience and compliance.​ 

---

For more information, head to our Forvis Mazars’ forensic investigation and compliance capabilities in Vietnam

📄 Please download the full document below to discover more. 

Documents

[ENG] Forvis Mazars in Viet Nam_​Thought catalyst_​Fraud Detection
[VIE] Forvis Mazars in Viet Nam_​Góc nhìn chuyên môn_​Phát hiện gian lân

Contact us