A conversation with ISSB – Are insurers ready for IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 implementation?

In this interview, Vitalina Kobernik is joined by Roberta Ravelli, technical staff at IFRS Foundation (Technical support, office of ISSB vice chair), to discuss the international sustainability standards issued by ISSB and the progress made by insurers in preparing climate-related disclosures.

In November 2024 IFRS Foundation issued the report on the progress on climate-related disclosures [1]. Can you please tell us more about the report itself and how insurers are incorporated in the report?

I think now is a good time to talk about the progress on climate-related disclosures for insurance companies because this report considers the progress made since October 2023, when the TCFD published its last annual report considering development and then disbanded. The Financial Stability Board, that set up the TFCD in the first place, has then asked IFRS foundation to take over the analysis on progress on climate-related disclosures. We published this report that analyses a sample of companies and the information they provided in their 2023 annual reports. When selecting the sample of companies, we considered different industries and, of course, the insurance industry is widely represented within the financial sector. The report analyses a sample of around 3800 companies, including 150 insurers, spanning life, health, multi-line and also some reinsurers. Similarly to previous reports prepared by the TCFD, we used Artificial Intelligence (AI) to analyse the information.

Over 100 insurers is a very impressive sample. Before we deep dive into the key highlights of the report, I wanted to touch on TCFD reporting as I understand that insurers that report under TCFD are in a better shape to prepare for the adoption of IFRS S1 and IFRS S2. Can you please explain why it is helpful?

That is totally right. The report just published has analysed the use of the TFCD recommendations by companies. Most of them are in the process of transitioning from the disclosures prepared using the TCFD recommendations to the disclosures prepared using the ISSB standards. The ISSB Standards, IFRS S1 and IFRS S2, have incorporated the TCFD recommendations so there is no need for companies that use these standards to also use the TCFD recommendations. This incorporation is illustrated in a comparison document that the IFRS Foundation has published and is available to all on the website.

It is possible that some regulators might still require insurance companies to still use the TCFD recommendations during the transition phase but as you have highlighted, I think insurers are well positioned to complete this transition as the ISSB standards have built on the original TFCD recommendations.

When reading the headlines of the report, I noted that insurance companies, along with energy companies disclosed more information aligned with the TCFD recommendations than companies in other industries. Can you expand on this?

The report has analysed the disclosures provided by different industries, including the insurance sector. The TCFD recommendations have 11 recommended disclosures. Not all companies, according to our sample, use the 11 recommended disclosures, on average there are five of the 11 that are used.

When looking at the insurance sector, the average number is higher, with more than five recommended disclosures present in the 2023 reports we have analysed. There are, of course, variations when looking at different regions as well.

Still, the overall key takeaway is that the insurance sector has a higher level of disclosures when using the TCFD recommendations.   

Is this across all TCFD pillars or are there any more advanced pillars compared to others?

For insurance companies, the level of disclosures is very high in terms of Governance and Risk Management pillars, and their associated recommended disclosures respectively:

- Board oversight and management’s role for Governance pillar. 

- Description of climate-related risks and opportunities.

- Risk identification and assessment processes, risk management processes and integration into overall risk management for Risk Management pillar.

This is very much in line with what we see in our accounts review for insurers, with particular attention taken in the reporting and disclosure around Governance and Risk Management. Why do you think this is the case?

The report is very factual in its analysis of the percentage of disclosures by each company, so the reason is not discussed. Still, based on my knowledge of the industry, I think it’s related to the focus of some financial regulators on risk and risk management processes, also insurance business, by definition, is managing risk. So they are best placed to report on this topic.

On the other hand, in our reviews, we noticed how the Scenario analysis and Metric and Targets pillars sometimes need improvement and/or not all the recommendations are disclosed. Have you noticed something similar in your report?

I think you’ve identified exactly the two areas where the level of disclosures can offer room for improvement compared to the other more established areas. A mandated set of standards can help with that.

On the resilience of the company’s strategy under different scenarios is one area, where, in general, companies across industries have a lower level of disclosures compared to others, so insurers are not alone here.

Regarding the climate-related targets, it is true that the level of disclosure is slightly lower than areas like Governance or Strategy, but there are several resources that companies can use to improve and refer to during the transition from the use of the TCFD recommendations to the use of the ISSB Standards. 

That is very helpful as tackling TCFD recommendations is the first step in getting ready for IFRS S1 and IFRS S2. Then expanding it to additional disclosures, for example the disclosures of finance emissions, a hot topic for insurers, who will need to disclose the finance emissions from their investment portfolios. Finally, what would be your advice for those insurers that are part of this adoption journey?

Everybody is on a journey in this phase, practice will evolve, disclosures will improve, there will not be perfection on day one. There are areas that will require the use of estimates, and who better than insurers can make estimates. Some aspects will be refined as they learn how to do that, but if you are already using TCFD recommendations, you are in a good position to start your journey towards IFRS S1 and S2 reporting.

Get in touch with our financial services experts

To speak to our experts about the IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 disclosures or TCFD recommendations, get in touch using the form below.

Contact us today

Sources 

[1] Progress on Corporate Climate-related Disclosures—2024 Report

Key contacts