Recent research reported by Civil Society indicates that around one third of entry‑level and junior charity roles are now paid below the Real Living Wage, an increase on prior years and a sign of growing financial pressure across the sector. The findings are based on CharityJob’s Salary Report 2026, which reviewed more than 55,000 charity roles advertised in 2025. [civilsociety.co.uk]
While many charities continue to meet their statutory pay obligations, the data shows a widening gap between legal minimum pay anxd the cost of living, particularly for junior staff.
Real Living Wage vs statutory minimum pay
The distinction between the National Minimum Wage / National Living Wage and the Real Living Wage is key to this issue:
- The statutory minimum wage is set by government and represents the legal baseline.
- The Real Living Wage, calculated independently by the Living Wage Foundation, reflects actual living costs, is set at a higher level and is a voluntary commitment.
Research highlighted in the CharityJob Salary Report 2026 shows that 33% of junior roles outside London fell below the UK Real Living Wage, while 34% of comparable roles in London fell below the London Living Wage in 2025. Although legally compliant, these pay levels may leave employees struggling to meet basic living costs. [civilsociety.co.uk]
Employers are subject to increasing scrutiny of their National Minimum Wage compliance by HM Revenue & Customs and the Fair Work Agency. Organisations, including charities, that are found in breach of paying the statutory minimum rate face financial penalties of up to 200% of the underpayment, calculated over a six‑year period. In addition, the Department for Business and Trade publicly name non‑compliant employers, exposing them to reputational damage that could adversely affect future funding and sponsorship opportunities.
Why are junior roles are disproportionately affected?
Junior and entry‑level roles are more exposed for a combination of structural reasons:
- Funding constraints – many roles are tied to fixed or restricted grants, limiting flexibility to adjust pay.
- Wage compression – increases in the statutory minimum wage reduce the differential between entry‑level and more experienced roles.
- Market perception – junior roles are often seen as easier to recruit for despite rising living costs.
- Regional cost pressures – particularly outside London, living costs are rising faster than pay in some regions. [civilsociety.co.uk]
Over time, this creates risks around recruitment, retention and workforce diversity, as lower‑paid roles may become inaccessible to those without financial support.
| |
The employment tax and reward perspectiveWhile increasing base pay may not always be immediately affordable, employers are not limited to salary alone when shaping a reward strategy. From an employment tax perspective, there are opportunities to enhance overall reward value whilst managing cost and tax efficiency. These may include: - Salary sacrifice arrangements (where appropriate), such as for pension contributions or approved benefits (e.g. Electric Vehicles), which can deliver potential tax and / or National Insurance savings for both employer and employee.
- Tax‑exempt or low‑tax benefits in kind, including qualifying wellbeing, welfare and trivial benefits.
- Flexible benefits and non‑cash reward, such as enhanced leave, hybrid working, staff suggestion schemes, employee of the month, Long Service Awards and structured development programmes, which can materially improve the employee value proposition.
- Focus on training and development by using Apprenticeship training investment that may be available (from the Government, Apprenticeship Levy pots or sharing larger organisations’ funding).
- Targeted reward reviews focused on lower‑paid roles to ensure compliance, manage risk and optimise take‑home value.
These approaches are not a substitute for fair pay, but they can play a meaningful role in supporting junior employees during periods of financial constraint. |
Get in touch
The increasing proportion of junior charity roles paid below the Real Living Wage shows that there is need for proactive reward planning, not reactive pay fixes. If you would like to understand your exposure to National Living/Minimum Wage risk, explore tax‑efficient reward options, or review whether your current pay and benefits strategy supports recruitment and retention, please get in touch with our Employment Tax and Reward team.
Our experts can support with:
- Reward and pay strategy reviews, including assessment of National Living/Minimum Wage exposure, pay structures and wage compression risk.
- Employment tax health checks to identify compliance gaps and opportunities for tax‑efficient reward.
- Design and implementation of salary sacrifice and benefit arrangements, including modelling of cost and NIC savings.
- Governance and policy support, helping trustees and senior leadership understand risk, reputational considerations and funding implications.
- Practical implementation support, from payroll alignment to employee communications.
Get in touch