Six common myths about Building Liability Orders

Building Liability Orders (BLOs) are often seen as complex and discretionary and difficult to pursue, but that view is starting to shift. Here are six myths we still see across the social housing sector and why they’re increasingly worth challenging.

Myth 1: ‘If the developer is insolvent, there’s nowhere to go’

For many social housing providers, this is the most persistent misconception. BLOs were expressly designed to deal with scenarios where the original contracting entity is thinly capitalised, dissolved or insolvent. The existence (or otherwise) of that original company is no longer the limiting factor it once was.

In reality, the more relevant questions are:

  • Where did control and value sit during the life of the development?
  • Was the original contracting entity part of a larger, solvent corporate group?

Once that lens is applied, insolvency stops being an endpoint and becomes a starting signal for wider investigation.

Myth 2: ‘BLOs only apply to fire safety’

BLO conversations still default to cladding and fire risk, often overlooking the breadth of what “relevant liability” can capture. Fitness for habitation, structural issues and wider building safety risks all potentially fall within scope. That matters because it changes which schemes are even considered for recovery assessment.

For housing providers and local authorities managing large, ageing estates, this distinction matters. Schemes may be incurring substantial remediation costs that sit outside typical ‘fire safety’ labels, and therefore outside initial recovery discussions, even though liability may still be capable of being pursued.

Myth 3: ‘You need to prove everything before you even start’

Another common belief is that BLOs only come into play at the very end of a dispute, once liability has been fully established through court proceedings.

For housing providers under pressure to remediate quickly and demonstrate progress to regulators, early understanding of where responsibility may ultimately lie can influence decisions long before any final determination. BLO analysis is increasingly being carried out alongside technical and liability assessments, not after them.

This doesn’t mean acting without evidence. It means recognising that understanding exposure, financial capacity and group structures early can support better decisions about adjudication, negotiation, funding and overall strategy.

Myth 4: ‘If the structure is too complex, it’s not worth untangling’

Complex group structures, overseas entities and historic reorganisations are often cited as reasons not to pursue recovery. As a result, complexity is often treated as a reason to step back.

However, those same features can strengthen the narrative around control, benefit and fairness, particularly where value has been extracted through layers of corporate insulation.

The real challenge is not complexity, but the ability to see through it. When financial analysis and corporate mapping are done well, large groups can often be narrowed down to a relatively small number of genuinely viable and asset-rich targets.

Myth 5: ‘BLOs are only useful if you go to court’

Perhaps the most limiting misconception is that BLOs only have value if litigation is the end goal.

Some of the most effective uses of BLO analysis never result in litigation, and instead inform:

  • credibility in negotiations;
  • decisions on adjudication or mediation;
  • funding discussions; and
  • board‑level choices on whether to absorb or pursue costs.

Myth 6: ‘BLOs are only in effect during the construction period’

A BLO operates retrospectively. It may be made against the original contracting entity, as well as any associated entity within its corporate group that was connected to it at any point from the commencement of the construction project, in respect of which the relevant liability arose, through to the date on which the BLO is granted.

Contact us

For housing providers balancing resident safety, regulatory scrutiny and financial resilience, BLOs are increasingly about leverage and informed choice — not simply enforcement.

The question for many housing providers is no longer whether BLOs exist, but when, and how, they should be part of the conversation. If you would like to explore how Building Liability Orders may affect your organisation, or to discuss potential risk, recovery or strategy, please get in touch.

Get in touch

Key contacts